I have to admit I'm a little torn over this issue. Read the beginning of the article below.
TRENTON, N.J. -- A longtime critic of Rutgers University's drive into big-time sports is being criticized over a newspaper article comment that university officials have branded as racist.
At the end of a New York Times article Wednesday about William C. Dowling's failed efforts to get Rutgers to turn away from high-stakes athletics, the tenured English professor responded to arguments that athletic scholarships provide opportunity to low-income, minority students.
"If you were giving the scholarship to an intellectually brilliant kid who happens to play a sport, that's fine," Dowling said. "But they give it to a functional illiterate who can't read a cereal box, and then make him spend 50 hours a week on physical skills. That's not opportunity. If you want to give financial help to minorities, go find the ones who are at the library after school."
Rutgers Athletic Director Bob Mulcahy told local newspapers that Dowling's comment was "a blatantly racist statement."
I remember being annoyed that there were those who received scholarships, but not for any academic prowess. Of course, my annoyance was not in the context specified above ... I was pissed off at anyone who received the ill-begotten assistance.
I'm with the professor. Give the money where it will do the most good.
I wonder what the one or two who read this blog think?
Late Night Side-Eye Open Thread — Trump to NASA: “To the MOON, Alice!” - Trump orders NASA to send American astronauts to the Moon, Mars https://t.co/RN5ilGlhgM — CNBC (@CNBC) December 11, 2017 I was too young for the Honeymoone...
19 minutes ago