Would you be refering to the first amendment that guarentees the right of free speech to all, or the first amendment that only guarentees that right to people who agree with liberals.
Or how about the one where the President's job is to protect America, or the constituition that says that you can't do anything without Feingolds approval.
How about the constitution that says its ok for gov't to take private property if it increases the tax base?
How about the constitution that limits gov't, or do you want me to root for the one that limits individual freedoms?
How about the one that says that I have a right to carrie a weapon.
Please let me know what constitution you are reading.
Elliot's point I enjoyed in the gentle jab it was intended, Clint.
Your points make no sense at all. None of them have any factual basis for argument (in the constitution); other than your second amendment point, which I have a more generous view of, closely resembling conservative thought on it.
So far, par for the course from you. When you want to deal with facts, let me know. You're welcome to comment anytime.
Climate Solutions: New Grid Rules and Big Bison
-
I don’t remember when I stumbled on Beau – he describes himself as a
southern journalist and his takes are thoughtful – but this morning there
was this n...
Bloodlands
-
This (gift link) is a very sobering essay by Megan Stack, about the
political situation in Israel in regard to the Palestinian question. The
bottom line,...
Cohen Cross-Examination and Other News
-
Michael Cohen is still being cross-examined today. As far as I can tell,
the defense may be planting some reasonable doubt in jurors’ minds.
However, it’...
This feed has moved and will be deleted soon. Please update your
subscription now.
-
The publisher is using a new address for their RSS feed. Please update your
feed reader to use this new URL:
*http://www.alternet.org/home/feed*
It’s a hot take, except it’s cold and doesn’t take
-
Why is David Gergen still alive? This might seem like a rather harsh
question — and certainly no one here wishes him dead — but what is
accomplished by pay...
Jonah Speaks at Concordia University
-
I gave a talk at my alma mater Concordia University, talking about the
future of journalism and the craft of storytelling. Tons of fun!
Find the full tal...
How It Ends
-
As Republican lawmakers give their tongue bath to poisonous SCOTUS nominee
Brett Kavanaugh, this piece by legendary journalist Bob Woodward drops that
pai...
That's It For Today
-
This is my last post for the day. Starting in a few minutes we'll be
replacing the guts of our website with something newer and better than what
we have...
WTF Part 1: The Jurors Have Spoken
-
In May of this year, I had the honor of doing three jury trials in Racine
and Milwaukee. It is unusual for me to have trials three weeks in a row,
and in t...
Creationist classification of theropods
-
“Liaoning scene” by Emily Willoughby. Guest post by Jonathan Kane. Mr. Kane
describes himself as an “armchair paleontologist” who worked as an intern
at th...
Is Buddhism Still Hip?
-
Dr. Andrew Skilton, Senior Research Fellow at King's College London, asks "Why
is Buddhism so hip?" And I thought, wow, we're still hip? I thought we had...
Ron Johnson Among Underwear Gnomes
-
Our man in Wausau, Rob Mentzer, pointed to this article in National Review tonight,
which details Senator Ron Johnson's secret plan for ending the governmen...
Summer of love
-
The six months since The International Bank of Bob was released have been a
blast. I have so many people to thank. Since last I updated this site (in
Febr...
Preferential Treatment for Bulletproof?
-
Highly controversial mining company, Gogebic Taconite, employed an
out-of-state firm to provide security and otherwise intimidate people
anywhere near the ...
A couple of questions for Justice Pat Roggensack
-
Why hasn't anybody asked Justice Pat Roggensack these questions? They seem
obvious to me, and I don't even live in Wisconsin any more.
1) Justice Roggens...
WI GOP: A History of Voter Suppression
-
So how will Wisconsin Republicans try to rig the state electorate in their
favor? Will they try to kill same-day registration, even though Gov. Scott
Walke...
Is that the Constitution with the right to an abortion in it or the regular one? ;)
ReplyDeleteNo. It's the one missing the right to privacy ... you know, the right everyone would be screaming about if it were suddenly taken away. (:p
ReplyDeleteWould you be refering to the first amendment that guarentees the right of free speech to all, or the first amendment that only guarentees that right to people who agree with liberals.
ReplyDeleteOr how about the one where the President's job is to protect America, or the constituition that says that you can't do anything without Feingolds approval.
How about the constitution that says its ok for gov't to take private property if it increases the tax base?
How about the constitution that limits gov't, or do you want me to root for the one that limits individual freedoms?
How about the one that says that I have a right to carrie a weapon.
Please let me know what constitution you are reading.
Elliot's point I enjoyed in the gentle jab it was intended, Clint.
ReplyDeleteYour points make no sense at all. None of them have any factual basis for argument (in the constitution); other than your second amendment point, which I have a more generous view of, closely resembling conservative thought on it.
So far, par for the course from you. When you want to deal with facts, let me know. You're welcome to comment anytime.
I do thank you for keeping it clean.